Monday, September 24, 2007

This week's cryptic Office Notes

Hi everyone,

In this week's Office Notes, under the Communications heading it lists a few things about supervisors '"popping in" on staff to have them take care of something...etc.', and "allowing employees who are responsible to be responsible for the task at hand." and so forth. It is somewhat vague. Maybe these are the types of things that could be discussed at an All Staff meeting to gain more clarity. It is just an idea.

Friday, September 21, 2007

Final Update for Iris Weis

My mother-in-law, Iris Weis, passed away yesterday afternoon after a long struggle to regain her health following by-pass surgery. It seemed that Iris was going to make it a couple weeks ago when she started physical therapy at Fresno Community. Then she had a second heart attack and her kidneys failed. Although her kidneys became functional, she never seemed to pull out of the downward spiral that started about that time. She was placed back in the intensive care unit of the heart hospital of Fresno Community where she stayed until her death. While there she did not eat much and had to have a feeding tube put down her nose. She complained of pain all over her body and never seemed to have any good days.
Thank you all for your concern.

Thursday, September 13, 2007

Health Update IV

Iris Weis, my mother-in-law, continues to struggle at Fresno Community Hospital. She is still in the cardiac intensive care unit of the hospital. It appears that her pace-maker is doing all right and that her kidneys are functioning. However, she has persistently refused to eat enough to help her regain her strength. The situation has become so bad that the doctor has recommended that she receive a feeding tube. He hopes to 'jump-start' her eating properly with a small feeding tube to give her the needed nutrition she lacks. Iris is a very particular eater. She does not like spiced food of any kind. Also some foods she rejects because of the texture! That is true in the case of Creme of Wheat. However, she has been turning down or eating very little of the food Dorothy and her sister, Joyce, have been bringing her.
Thank you for your concern for Iris!

Tuesday, September 4, 2007

Health Update III

My mother-in-law, Iris Weis, had a very serious set-back on Labor Day. Apparently she suffered a second heart attack leaving the top part of her heart beating out of sync with the bottom part. Her kidneys also stopped working. The basic problem probably stemmed from the fact that she was very dehydrated. You wouldn't think a person could get dehydrated while being cared for in a hospital, but she did. For some time now she has not wanted to eat much or drink enough liquids. The dehydration affected the kidneys which in turn put a strain on the heart. She is now in intensive care of the Fresno Community Hospital. She was moved from the physical rehabilitation area. Medication got her kidneys to function again, however the doctors still need to get her kidneys to work on their own without medication. They will also be working to get her heart to beat in sync again. She is getting plenty of fluids intravenously. Her condition now is stable.
Thank you for your love and concern!

Monday, August 20, 2007

Health Update II

My mother-in-law, Iris Weis, came close to death yesterday when for some unknown reason her blood pressure dropped almost to zero. It might have been because of a change in medication. The doctors were able to get her on an external pace-maker that was inserted through one of her arteries. She stabilized and got much better. The doctor also reported to the family (not to Iris) that she had a minor stroke that has affected her right side. I'm not sure when she may have had the stroke. He believes that with physical therapy she should recover complete use of her arm and leg. Last Thursday evening, I believe, after several days with a tube in a throat the respirator was removed and Iris could talk again. She really hated that part of the recovery. Thank you for your concern for her.
David H.

Wednesday, August 15, 2007

Health Update

I wanted to give an update on the health of my mother-in-law, Iris Weis. Iris is 81 years old and on Monday, August 13th she had tripple by-pass heart surgery. Also during that operation it was discovered that a valve to her heart was completely clogged, so she received an artificial valve. The doctors decided that the valve should be repaired since Iris is such an active person. She does a great deal of sewing for people, teaches line-dancing and works as a volunteer at the Madera Community Hospital. Because she has been taking baby aspirin for years and has recently been on Plavix, the bleeding was difficult to stop at the end of the surgery. It took a micro-drop of medicine to do it...the cost = $10,000! Presently she is still on a respirator which means having a tube down her throat. She really hates that part of the recovery, but it's necessary. Perhaps today (Wed., Aug. 15) she will be taken off of it and can breathe on her own.
David H.

Tuesday, July 24, 2007

sound(s) of music

If you want music as background in the department, vote in the affirmative. If you don't, no need to cast that negative vote! Or, just feel free to say why you think it's not a good idea. Or, is there some topic or idea someone would like to discuss so that we can start conversing on the blog, which is what blogging is about--an informal venue to put out ideas.

Thursday, July 19, 2007

summary of ALA

Here's the fun and educational stuff I did: visited the Library of Congress (had a wonderful exhibit of 20th century japanese art and went underground the building to the Coolidge auditorium where Dr. Billington, Librarian of Congress, was interviewed by C-Span) He's an impressive and distinguished representative for American libraries in my opinion. The Library has helped national libraries in Russia and Iraq among others with collection building and supporting digitization projects. Saw the staff room where staff go for good and relatively cheap eats. Walked through the Botanical gardens near the Capitol building and visited the National Archives. Went into the "research room" where they had some databases to do genealogical research and Diane found some things about her family history. All meals good and expensive, obviously many white collar types on expense accounts.
Attended only meetings which were at the Convention Center because it is just too complicated and a time waster to use the shuttle to go to all the different hotels. For me, it worked. These are some topics and conclusions or at least key points. First meeting which I actually managed to arrive for at 8:00 AM was on MARC. Even the presenters admitted it was too early and technical a topic for an early start. For those who are aware, there was a study done on the applicability of MARC fields from the records to the opac and service point, i.e. user. Some 20% of the fields are useful, however, some fields are not among those 20% and would be of extreme importance in some libraries with a special collection or clientele. Questions from the audience at the end brought up some issues which the research did not take into account and the presenters discussed their awareness of the issues and the limitations of the study in drawing any comprehensive or conclusive evidence that only 20% of MARC fields are worth having or keeping. However, it does indicate that MARC's value and applicability is under review. That's my non-scientific conclusion.
Here are just some things that caught my attention or challenged some preconceptions: Friends groups can attract people who are not library users and need to cultivate folks with a philanthropic mind set as well. Maybe create a Friends group for younger crowd. One library talked about a book club meeting at restaurants. That lead to inviting restauranteurs to talk about their experiences in starting a restaurant. The key is to create library supporters, not necessarily users. Program on Generation X, those are folks who are new faculty/staff, grad students and non traditionals. They want personalization and directness and like socialization and networking. Communicate via websites, direct mail without hype and to the point. Word of mouth, personalization, has impact.
Library reorganization--What are libraries key services? That helps to focus on outcomes and strategy. Ask staff what can be given up or changed. What are fantasy changes? What are the bottlenecks? How many people are needed to do a job and why? Right work being done at the right level? Do staff get opportunities to lead? Investigate best practices elsewhere but that isn't always where the innovation is--broaden point of view, include business and retail perspectives. What competencies are expected for staff? Reward culture that wants to try new things.
Presentation by Library Research Roundtable, included doctoral students and Proquest. Ethnographic study of undergrads using software, UserVue, to see how they do research. Found subjects through Facebook. 95% of students used library resources, so library outreach, course instructor, and brand awareness (Lexis, Proquest etc.) are effective. Problems with navigating webstire of Library, search catalog is front & center when e-resources, journal articles are what they want. Most use Google as a lookup. Social networking sites don't factor into student research. Library as place. Study involved going to coffeehouses to observe what students go and why they are there. Users see library as clinical institution as opposed to social place like coffee house. Coffee house concept started in Europe as a place where students could talk freely. Those who don't use Library prefer to study at home and buy their own books. Those who go to the library want to study, research, check out books. Coffee house environment is too noisy and lack of space. Age has a lot to do with learning style and age affects online interactions. Use of humor and get to know the person. Interaction may be the learning experience and not the factual answer. Face to face encounter contributed to more effective online interaction.

Friday, July 13, 2007

Appreciation

Dear Tech Staff,

Thank you for the very generous outpouring of kindness and concern for me at the passing of my mother on Monday, July 9th. I really appreciate your friendship! Mom was 87 1/2 years old at her passing. She had been blessed with a good life with relatively good health all the way through. Thanks again for your thoughtfulness!

David

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

Baker & Taylor Records Now Being Added to WorldCat

Hi folks!
This was in on my OCLC-CAT list this morning. Thought you'd be interested in knowing about it, as you will likely be coming across these skimpy records! They have funny caps, no subject headings, incorrect tagging for the author added entries, etc. On the records that I've seen, just about the only things right are the ISBN (so you'll get a direct hit), the title, and the publisher name and date of publication. It's just a very, very brief bib. (These will need to ultimately be upgraded by a cataloger.)

Hope this helps!
Julie

* * * *

Baker & Taylor, a leading supplier of materials to public libraries, is
now adding records to WorldCat.

Baker & Taylor, headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina, provides
books, music, DVDs, and video games as well as supporting collection
management and technical services to libraries around the world. The
titles are being added as part of the agreement between Baker & Taylor
and OCLC to partner in providing bibliographic records and expanded
technical services to schools and public libraries. See the press
release about this partnership at:
http://www.btol.com/viewnews.cfm?press_id=161&typ=c
And, you may access Baker & Taylor's website at: http://www.btol.com

Baker & Taylor records loaded into WorldCat are from two sources: 1)
Baker & Taylor's cataloging file, containing full and CIP cataloging
MARC records from Library of Congress as well as full cataloging MARC
records, produced by Baker & Taylor's MLS Catalogers when there was no
LOC record, and 2) Baker & Taylor's product file, containing brief
non-MARC records used in B&T's Order Processing System. These records
are converted to MARC by an OCLC mapping process. Both types of records
are then matched against WorldCat records through a batch process. When
a record is matched, BTCTA is added to field 040 subfield d. This
indicates that field 938 has been added to the matching record and
contains Baker & Taylor product data (Baker & Taylor unique identifier,
i.e., book number). No other editing of records occurs as part of this
process. When no matching record is identified through the batch
process, OCLC adds the Baker & Taylor record as a new record to
WorldCat. This record contains the symbol BTCTA in field 040 subfields a
and c.
Examples:
Cataloging file matches: #77573121, #77589800, #75390371
Cataloging file adds: #123119571, #123119328, #123118608
Product file matches: #70712452, #77553985
Product file adds: #144216551, #144216552, #144216553

Added product file records are very brief and are coded as abbreviated
records (Encoding Level 3). They are not created by or examined by a
cataloger. This provides customers using the new Baker& Taylor/OCLC
Cataloging Plus service with access to the OCLC number early in the
acquisitions workflow. For more information on these services go to
http://www.btol.com

OCLC encourages member libraries who acquire one of these titles to
upgrade and replace the record and receive credit on your OCLC bill for
upgrading that record. As Baker & Taylor catalogers are performing
cataloging services for customers, they will also be upgrading these
records. This is an important and key feature of the Baker & Taylor /
OCLC agreement.

In both cases of original records and matches, a 938 field is added to
the MARC record that contains the vendor code BTCP. This code is
indexed; vendor records are searchable using the vendor information
keyword index. For a list of all partners contributing records through
the Vendor Record Contribution Program, see:
http://www.oclc.org/partnerships/material/contribution/technical/default
.htm
(2007 06 20)

Chris Grabenstatter
Global Product Manager, Online Cataloging
OCLC Cataloging Products & Services
6565 Kilgour Place
Dublin, OH 43017
614-764-6181
800-848-5878 ext: 6181
fax: 614-718-7249
grabenst@oclc.org

Tuesday, June 5, 2007

information regarding genre headings

Do you all know about LC's plan to add 655, genre headings to records? This is different from and/or in addition to #v which has been used with subjects to express that the material contained within the manifestation is about the subject. Here is some info from the OCLC blog which supports the use of 655, which some think is redundant because we already use #v in headings. I think each library can do what they want, that is, implement and use 655 field in their catalog or not. The message from OCLC listserv starts below:


Well, I must admit when I initially submitted my 655 genre tag question to this list I had no idea what a Pandora's box I would be opening! I must also admit that I have found the discussion of this particular issue (and it does seem to be an issue) to be most interesting and enlightening. It has really given me some food for thought in regard to the coding of genre headings in our opac and in opacs in general.

Someone on this list stated that genre headings (in the 655 MARC field) cannot be subdivided. I find this odd since other 6xx fields can be subdivided, and I would appreciate knowing exactly where it states in any documentation that this is the case (which I may very well have overlooked).

Lindsey Martin



Joel Hahn wrote:
David Girshick wrote:> ... our end users cannot tell the difference between the ABOUT and theFORM/GENRE.I think you are likely selling your users short--anyone who has made itthrough high school (and many others who haven't gotten there yet)probably has enough of an idea what a "genre" is and how it differs froma subject, even if they can't properly pronounce the word.And even if not, it's a simple enough concept to briefly explain that 30seconds of B.I. or a "what am I" popup definition in the OPAC should besufficient.> Few catalogs separate them and if they did, few customers wouldunderstand the separation. Most searches are just keyword to beginwith.In 2007 so far, around 51% of all of the searches done in our OPAC were"general" keyword searches a la Google. The remaining 49% were authorkeyword, title keyword, subject keyword, series keyword, genre keyword,one of the other keyword indexes, some combination of the above, authorbrowse, title browse, or subject browse.So while 51% might technically be "most", I do not think it is enough tosay that anything more specific is only understood by a few and shouldnot be supported.Frank Newton wrote:> I think there is general agreement in favor of Love stories > and Western films as subject headings, but no general agreement > in favor of SEPARATING THEM OUT from 650 subject headings.Why do we also have 600, 610, 611, 630, and 651 headings? Why aren'tthey all 650 headings, or even simpler, just 600 headings? Especiallyif "most searches are just keyword to begin with."Because there are a significant number of people out there who DO knowhow to search a catalog beyond the simplicity of a general keywordsearch, DO benefit from being able to specify "subject: person" vs."subject: topic" vs. "subject: genre" vs. "subject: title", and whowould suffer a significant drop in service from the library if thatability were taken away.

Thursday, May 17, 2007

OCLC and local record display

What are the implications of this in the long run for any library with OCLC? Starting in July, it looks like an OCLC library can display not just the master record in the system but their own record...and edit it!

Cc

Bcc

Subject
[OCLC-CAT] OFFICIAL: 2007-05 Z39.50 Cataloging Institution Record Enhancements
OCLC plans to install enhancements to Z39.50 Cataloging on Sunday, May 20, 2007.

Below is information about these changes. (See also related message for 2007-05 Connexion Browser Institution Record Enhancements.)

Institution Records, General Information
As part of the combining with RLG, OCLC is adding Connexion and Z39.50 Cataloging functionality that supports the RLG concept known as clustering. OCLC is continuing with the master record concept, but is adding the ability to link institution records to the master record. Institution records contain additional cataloging data, such as local call numbers, holdings locations within the institution, or local or copy-specific notes. As an option, unique information in institution records is indexed and available for searching along with WorldCat indexes.

Institution records (IRs) are being loaded for RLG migrating libraries that requested this as part of their migration survey response. The source of these records is either from RLG Union Catalog or from libraries’ local systems. For more information on RLG Union Catalog migration projects, please see: http://www.oclc.org/community/rlg/rlg_master_schedule_external.pdf andStatus: RLG Union Catalog Integration into WorldCat http://www.rlg.org/en/page.php?Page_ID=21014 . IRs are assigned OCLC numbers. The OCLC number of the master record to which the IR is linked is system supplied in the 079 field of the IR.

Connexion browser and Z39.50 Cataloging support for institution records will be installed on May 20, 2007. NOTE: Connexion browser access to institution record indexing will be available mid-June 2007. Connexion client support for IRs is planned for late June 2007, as part of client version 2.00. For more information about client version 2.00, see http://www.oclc.org/connexion/interface/client/enhancements/future.htm .

Z39.50 Cataloging Institution Record Enhancements

Z39.50 Cataloging WorldCat searches will always return master records, and a separate search will be necessary to retrieve IRs linked to this master.

952 Fields
952 fields are being added to Master Records and Institution Records to provide a mechanism to identify the presence of linked Institution Records, as well as record control numbers and other information pertaining to linked Institution Records.

The 952 fields will display to all Z39.50 Cataloging users. If there are no Institution Records attached to the master record, no 952 fields will appear.

The first 952 field contains the information for the Master Record. The subsequent 952 fields contain the information for the Institution Records that are associated with that master record. 952 fields are in order by record control number.

The 952 field contains information specific to each of the records. This will help you determine which Institution Record you need for cataloging. This information is very similar to the Institution Record list display in Connexion.

Detailed documentation about Z39.50 Cataloging and Institution Records will be added to our Web site:
http://www.oclc.org/support/documentation/z3950/default.htm

Searching the Institution Record Database
Institution Records will be in a separate database. To search the Institution Record database, you will need to configure your client to access database name: OCLCInstitutionRecords

The following indexes are available in the Z39.50 Cataloging Institution Record database:

Institution Record Control Number: Use Attribute 12 with Structure Attribute word or phrase. Indexes the 001 field.
System Control Number: Use Attribute 5028 with Structure Attribute phrase. Indexes the 035 subfield a.
Master Record Control Number: Use Attribute 9911 with Structure Attribute word. This will list all the Institution Records associated with a particular master record.
Holding Institution: Use Attribute 56 with Structure Attribute word. Search by OCLC institution symbol. Indexes the holdings information.


Setting Holdings
If you have implemented the Extended Services Definition you can set holdings on any institution record if you are profiled for institution records. Note: The holdings will be attached to the master record.

To set holdings while you are in the Institution Record database your client must be configured to use database name: OCLCInstitutionRecords
For information on the Extended Service Definition see:
http://www.oclc.org/support/documentation/z3950/databaseupdate/

Control Numbers
The master record control number is in the 001 field and the 035 field in the master record.

In an Institution Record, the master record number is in the 079 field. The 001 field and the 035 field in an Institution Record contain the control number for the Institution Record.

See also Technical Bulletin 254: OCLC-MARC Format Update 2007 and Institution Records to Accommodate the RLG Union Catalog http://www.oclc.org/support/documentation/worldcat/tb/254/ for details.

Thursday, May 10, 2007

Wednesday, May 9, 2007

Test

Testing!

Test

I'm officially a blogger!

first time

Now I can post as well as look and comment.

Remainder of Jean's collection

After discussing with a group of co-workers this morning, I emailed Anne Magana and offered to purchase 2 Costco cakes from the Library on the day of Jean's service. Also offered Anne the choice of using the balance for whatever else was needed. She chose the cakes. We have $27.85 left over. I can chip in the rest. Darren has a membership and said he would be happy to pick up the cakes. I hope everyone will like this idea.

test

I made it too!!!!!!

Here I am!

I made it!

Test

This is a test.

Test

test
Test

Testing

Testing 1, 2, 3

Tuesday, May 8, 2007

Warning

A funny thing happened to me setting up this blog account. I accidently typed in "glog" instead of "blog" and it gave me a nasty porno site. So, be careful!! Ruth was close by and we had a good laugh over it. I'm glad I wasn't demonstrating this in front of a group of people. :)

Monday, May 7, 2007

Friday, May 4, 2007

Volunteer to be on staff teams

I want to encourage all staff in Technical Services to think about volunteering to be on one of the two groups that Peter talked about at yesterday's staff meeting, i.e. staff development or staff recognition. He sent a followup email today. This is an opportunity for you to work with a group of staff from all over the library, and to have your ideas heard and implemented. Paula

Tuesday, May 1, 2007

Tech services getting techno savvy ;)

Good idea Ruth!

Welcome to Tech Services blog!

Here it is! Technical Services very own BLOG! This is a place for us to chat about what we are doing in Tech Services. Please post concerns, questions, comments. Our main objective is to gain better communication within our department. Welcome to our blog! Post awayyyy!